Deconstructing Michelangelo!
Join Free Art WorkShopJoin Premium Art Workshop

Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Deconstructing Michelangelo!

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    74
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0

    Deconstructing Michelangelo!

    Okay im a little upset. I dont want to post this, but i figured what the heck. I decided to recreate a master painting or sculpture. Mainly for rendering practice and brush techniques. I was feeling good about the image until i realized i royally Screwed up.

    here is the current state:


    Some WIP images.
    i pencilled the image directly in photoshop from the book next to me, i wanted to use the grid method, but i wasnt about to draw squares on my new book. so i just freehanded the best i could.



    The reference photo and other shots




    after taking a picture and looking at the current state and reference photo side by side. i realizes my proportions are totally off . I attempted the Liquify tool several times but to no success.


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Montreal, Quebec
    Posts
    329
    Thanks
    218
    Thanked 100 Times in 62 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    I like the values, but yeah... it's a bit late to fix those proportions. Why not just start over, I bet you'll do it much faster and better the 2nd time around.

    Arish in the Mirror - Self-Portrait page

    Sketchbook
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Sussex
    Posts
    2,545
    Thanks
    102
    Thanked 1,475 Times in 730 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    I frequently throw a lasso around parts and move them around, scale them up and down, rotate them until I'm happy. Not to mention, erasing bits and redrawing them. Photoshop means never having to say throw it out and start again...

    I was once on the receiving end of a critique so savagely nasty, I marched straight out of class to the office and changed my major (sketchbook).
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Stoat For This Useful Post:


  5. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    74
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    128
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    your David looks flat comparing to michelangelo's David.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Nottingham UK
    Posts
    1,378
    Thanks
    492
    Thanked 1,248 Times in 588 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Try looking at the negative shapes as well - that should help lots too.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    74
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    nemomarlin: thats why i posted it here.

    Venger: you are right, i do need to do that. i hardly look at negative space. i only focus on the "filled" space

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  9. #8
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Hong Kong, Bangkok, Darjeeling
    Posts
    182
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    You're a brave man. Recreating a masterpiece is no small task. I keep thinking I'll get around to attempting a Whistler or some Dutch masterpiece one of these years... fuck... I'd like to get around to doing a half decent Calvin & Hobbs.

    I think you're biggest problem (no doubt you're already aware of this) is your anatomy is off. Part of that is copying from a photograph. It's very easy for distortion to creep in. Depending on the lens used it might be seeing the subject in a totally different way than your eye would. The angle of view can change a lot of things and usually not for the better.

    The other factor... that angle looking up under the chin and nose is usually one of the more difficult poses to pull of successfully. I usually never go that route because I hate that angle because it's hard. lol.

    You could always go back and start from scratch... this time work out the anatomy from the simple structure up instead of just going for broke with a photograph. You will most likely end up getting closer to where you want to go. The great thing about that piece is there are lots of photo references... the not so great thing about that piece... is that there tons of photos of it from below it. :p

    Good luck bro.

    Mambo

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to mambo For This Useful Post:


Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •