View Full Version : Satyr Creature Girl
DavidArt20
November 4th, 2005, 04:41 PM
.jpg vv
madster
November 4th, 2005, 05:04 PM
1. This is NOT the place for "quick" anything. Consider it MOVED.
2. Bad anatomy, even for a fanstasy creature. Feet different sizes, legs different lengths and thicknesses, hips uneven, shoulders crooked, forearms crooked, elbows different, upper arms different, shoulders inconsistent, breasts inconsistent, cheekbone and nose too pronounced and angular, head placed too far forward on neck, hair flat, light souce inconsistant with hightlights/shadows, the horizon line is crooked, and there is no indication of any type of background...
~ Next time, refine some first, THEN ask for feedback. This is so crude as to be little more than a thumbnail with colors, and isn't that interesting to rush for public acclaim. Go ahead an refine. Show us your skills, rather than asking everyone else what they think...
~M
Poohgee
November 4th, 2005, 05:05 PM
What is the "concept" behind this - what is this ?
What are you trying to do ?
Well legs arms & shoes look .. ehh ... anatomically painful :)....
what is this .. so we can properly C+C this ?
DavidArt20
November 4th, 2005, 06:31 PM
Ok well heres the anatomy as I understand it, please let me know where you have issues.
http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d160/DavidArt20/AnatomyFrontal.jpg
Poohgee
November 5th, 2005, 06:46 AM
The blue drawing above one its own I actually quite like -
as above she/it has breasts - I guess it means she is a mutated woman of some kind .
Id say the shoulders are way too wide & with that size maybe make the hips quite a bit wider.
Maybe its just my attention :) - but her breasts are looking at me while the rest of her body is looking into a different direction .
Her "actual" body - the green bit looks a bit small in comparison to the rest IMO .
The foot in the anatomical drawing looks to me a bit small.
She is extremly musclely for a woman Id say.
The thigh in the above blue drawing looks too long in my opinion.
The collapsing legs in your painting - they are oviously non-human - is that another joint or a strange bone that makes these legs possible.
Does that bit help her jump further & higher ?
Problem is that between your anatomical drawing & your painting there are quite a few differences.
Maybe a lot of it is down to the clothing she is wearing.
Maybe start it again but then based on the anatomical version & then build upon that.
Just IMO.
Bad Brownie
November 5th, 2005, 02:45 PM
Yea, I was going to say...the blue anatomical drawing is good. The problem is it looks nothing like the painted picture. If your anatomy is adequate in the drawing below, why didn't it carry over?
Kanji2000
November 5th, 2005, 06:36 PM
Actually, even the anatomical drawing is off...Measure the length of both legs...They're unequal...If you drew action lines for the red drawing and another set for the blue, there would be very obvious differences...If your construction lines are wrong, how do you expect the detailing to look right??? In effect, the concept doesn't work...
bkboggy
November 5th, 2005, 08:57 PM
Her body is kind of twisted... The breasts point to the right corner, while the rest of the body points to the left corner. If you can draw her with the same anatomy as in the second picture, she'll look great.
vBulletin® v3.8.2, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.