wronghand
January 12th, 2003, 11:48 AM
Some questions:
I have been thinking of giving digital painting a whirl. It has some very alluring
advantages, in particular the ease of making alterations in comparison to
traditional media. And healthier compared to oils.
The one disadvantage that I see is a similiarity in the overall feel of digital
media, in particular rendered images. I often cannot tell the difference
between artists unless they have a strong individual drawing style.
The questions:
Is this something others see? And is it a problem?
Is it no different than the way that drawings in pencil have a similiar
feel, or oil paintings have a similiar feel?
Is it more a culture thing, artists being affected by other artists in this
new medium?
Any thoughts would be helpful and appreciated.
Thanks,
Michael Kerr
http://www.wronghand.com
I have been thinking of giving digital painting a whirl. It has some very alluring
advantages, in particular the ease of making alterations in comparison to
traditional media. And healthier compared to oils.
The one disadvantage that I see is a similiarity in the overall feel of digital
media, in particular rendered images. I often cannot tell the difference
between artists unless they have a strong individual drawing style.
The questions:
Is this something others see? And is it a problem?
Is it no different than the way that drawings in pencil have a similiar
feel, or oil paintings have a similiar feel?
Is it more a culture thing, artists being affected by other artists in this
new medium?
Any thoughts would be helpful and appreciated.
Thanks,
Michael Kerr
http://www.wronghand.com