Anid Maro
October 10th, 2008, 12:50 PM
A'ight, so last night I was playing around with some color charts. Every now and then I'll make digital swatches and arrange them in different ways, to see if any apparent correlations pop up.
Typically I would arrange Warm vs. Cool colors with Yellow being the warmest and Blue the coolest. This works out neatly since when viewed in grayscale Yellow has the lightest value while Blue has the darkest, the values then radiate outwards with Aquamarine and Fuchsia being neutrals with a sort of middle gray value.
488481
However this time around I organized based off of the "apparent" neutrals. That is I just intuitively picked out what looked neutral to me and went from there. I ended up with my neutrals being Green and Magenta instead.
488480
I spent most the rest of last night thinking about how Warm and Cool colors should be organized. While sorting them by value fits neatly, I end up with two neutrals that I'd peg as either cool (Aquamarine) or warm (Fuchsia). On the flip side, working with Green and Magenta neutrals screws up the values, but the hues visually fit better to me and the additive/subtractive primaries make more sense this way (RGB/CMY, a cool a warm and a neutral).
I'm leaning towards the G/M neutrals, but my only justifications are the primaries fit and it looks "right". So my question to you is...
Is there any correlation between the value of a color and how warm or cool it is? If not, then what seperates a warm from a neutral from a cool?
Here's the rest of my chart for reference. The value relationships that are clear is that the additive primaries are the darkest three colors, the subtractive primaries are the brightest three colors (makes sense when you think of how additive/subtractive mixing works), teritaries are in the middle, and the compliment of a color sits opposite on the value scale (a "light" color has a "dark" complementary, and vice versa).
488479
Typically I would arrange Warm vs. Cool colors with Yellow being the warmest and Blue the coolest. This works out neatly since when viewed in grayscale Yellow has the lightest value while Blue has the darkest, the values then radiate outwards with Aquamarine and Fuchsia being neutrals with a sort of middle gray value.
488481
However this time around I organized based off of the "apparent" neutrals. That is I just intuitively picked out what looked neutral to me and went from there. I ended up with my neutrals being Green and Magenta instead.
488480
I spent most the rest of last night thinking about how Warm and Cool colors should be organized. While sorting them by value fits neatly, I end up with two neutrals that I'd peg as either cool (Aquamarine) or warm (Fuchsia). On the flip side, working with Green and Magenta neutrals screws up the values, but the hues visually fit better to me and the additive/subtractive primaries make more sense this way (RGB/CMY, a cool a warm and a neutral).
I'm leaning towards the G/M neutrals, but my only justifications are the primaries fit and it looks "right". So my question to you is...
Is there any correlation between the value of a color and how warm or cool it is? If not, then what seperates a warm from a neutral from a cool?
Here's the rest of my chart for reference. The value relationships that are clear is that the additive primaries are the darkest three colors, the subtractive primaries are the brightest three colors (makes sense when you think of how additive/subtractive mixing works), teritaries are in the middle, and the compliment of a color sits opposite on the value scale (a "light" color has a "dark" complementary, and vice versa).
488479