Jack the R
December 6th, 2007, 03:25 AM
I'm working on revamping my painting process, after reading through Briggsy's Dimensions of Color write-up. (http://www.huevaluechroma.com)
The big eye opener for me was being able to use black to shade, (http://www.huevaluechroma.com/101.php) after being told adamantly that you can not use black to shade. According to shortcut 3, the "glazing" technique can be done in a technically accurate way. I've disliked the results I've gotten with the glazing technique in the past, but I was doing it wrong, using overlay or color. After reading through Briggsy's explanation, I hope to get better results.
(I still need to test what multiply does with relative brightness at 255 and varying levels of saturation - is the relative brightness of the final color equal to that of the grayscale tone, or is it decreased/darkened? I think the final color will have the same relative brightness, and take on the hue/saturation of the multiplied color layer, but I'm not sure yet.)
I usually start out with a loose line sketch. I've got no idea whether it is better to start out this way, or with a tonal sketch. I may prefer sketching because I'm more comfortable with line art, but it also feels faster. I also like to build around abstract "lines of motion." There's bound to be a terminology for this which I do not know.
http://www.extinctionlevelevent.com/learning/process_01/gb_process_01.jpg
Next I started working out the tonal pattern. I got this far -
http://www.extinctionlevelevent.com/learning/process_01/gb_process_02.jpg
and then decided to "preview" the glazing -
http://www.extinctionlevelevent.com/learning/process_01/gb_process_03.jpg
I'm happy with the direction the tonal painting is moving in, but not sold on the glazing technique. I'm sure it will look better over a finished tonal painting, but not sure it will look as good as it would painted straight in color. I'll think about it more tomorrow. I look forward to any comments any mentor types want to leave :yum:
The big eye opener for me was being able to use black to shade, (http://www.huevaluechroma.com/101.php) after being told adamantly that you can not use black to shade. According to shortcut 3, the "glazing" technique can be done in a technically accurate way. I've disliked the results I've gotten with the glazing technique in the past, but I was doing it wrong, using overlay or color. After reading through Briggsy's explanation, I hope to get better results.
(I still need to test what multiply does with relative brightness at 255 and varying levels of saturation - is the relative brightness of the final color equal to that of the grayscale tone, or is it decreased/darkened? I think the final color will have the same relative brightness, and take on the hue/saturation of the multiplied color layer, but I'm not sure yet.)
I usually start out with a loose line sketch. I've got no idea whether it is better to start out this way, or with a tonal sketch. I may prefer sketching because I'm more comfortable with line art, but it also feels faster. I also like to build around abstract "lines of motion." There's bound to be a terminology for this which I do not know.
http://www.extinctionlevelevent.com/learning/process_01/gb_process_01.jpg
Next I started working out the tonal pattern. I got this far -
http://www.extinctionlevelevent.com/learning/process_01/gb_process_02.jpg
and then decided to "preview" the glazing -
http://www.extinctionlevelevent.com/learning/process_01/gb_process_03.jpg
I'm happy with the direction the tonal painting is moving in, but not sold on the glazing technique. I'm sure it will look better over a finished tonal painting, but not sure it will look as good as it would painted straight in color. I'll think about it more tomorrow. I look forward to any comments any mentor types want to leave :yum: